<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ORANGEBLOG &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com</link>
	<description>A peek under our brim, to see what we're thinking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Settling down for a long winter nap</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/12/22/settling-down-for-a-long-winter-nap/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/12/22/settling-down-for-a-long-winter-nap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORANGEHAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/12/22/settling-down-for-a-long-winter-nap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what we hope becomes a holiday staple here at ORANGEHAT, we&#8217;re going to try and take it easy for the rest of the year.
We will be officially closed on December 24th &#038; 25th to spend time with family and friends for Christmas. We will resume operations on Monday the 28th &#8211; but on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">In what we hope becomes a holiday staple here at ORANGEHAT, we&#8217;re going to try and take it easy for the rest of the year.</p>
<p style="clear: both">We will be officially <strong><em>closed</em></strong> on December 24th &#038; 25th to spend time with family and friends for Christmas. We will resume operations on Monday the 28th &#8211; <em>but on a light schedule.</em> We&#8217;re analyzing and wrapping up some things for an even more exciting 2010. So we&#8217;ll be working &#8220;half days&#8221; for the final week of the 2009.</p>
<p style="clear: both">We use the term &#8220;half day&#8221; loosely. We&#8217;ll still be taking calls, and we&#8217;ll still be making plenty of print &#038; web things pretty for our clients, but all new work will be scheduled to begin in 2010. </p>
<p style="clear: both">Normal operations will resume as usual on Monday, Jan 4th 2010. </p>
<p style="clear: both">Cheers &#038; Happy Holidays!</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/12/22/settling-down-for-a-long-winter-nap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Snowy Cat</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/08/24/the-snowy-cat/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/08/24/the-snowy-cat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I make no attempts to hide our love of Apple Computers here at ORANGEHAT. And today I was welcomed to the pre-order of the latest version of Mac OS X &#8211; Snow Leopard (10.6). Of course I&#8217;ve placed our order and will be upgrading this weekend, but that&#8217;s not why I&#8217;m typing this. Although, if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make no attempts to hide our love of Apple Computers here at ORANGEHAT. And today I was welcomed to the pre-order of the latest version of Mac OS X &#8211; Snow Leopard (10.6). Of course I&#8217;ve placed our order and will be upgrading this weekend, but that&#8217;s not why I&#8217;m typing this. Although, if you want to pick up a copy, head on over to <a title="Preorder Snow Leopard" href="http://store.apple.com/" target="_blank">Apple&#8217;s Online Store.</a> <img src='http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Moreover, it&#8217;s about the new packaging of the OS. This will mark the first time that Apple has actually used a picture of the corresponding animal for box art. Place your peepers on this:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Snow Leopard" src="http://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/2041/1580/as-images.apple.com/is/image/AppleInc/MC223?wid=326&amp;hei=326&amp;fmt=jpeg&amp;qlt=95&amp;op_sharpen=0&amp;resMode=bicub&amp;op_usm=0.5,0.5,0,0&amp;iccEmbed=0&amp;layer=comp" alt="" width="326" height="326" /></p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not really feeling it. In the past, it was the focus on the &#8220;X&#8221; for the version of OS X (10). In version 10.2 (aka Jaguar), Apple had Pixar created a spotted version of the &#8220;X&#8221;. Complete with fur textures and patterns of the big kitty. And while granted, this is not a full revamped OS, like previous .1+ upgrades, I do find it strange for them to be focusing on imagery like this. Even box art that uses images (iPods, iPhones, iMacs, etc), they seem to use the images in a more elegant way. I really enjoy the simple and more dynamic layouts that Apple has produced, and I hope this is simply a one-off since this OS is just a retooling and not a revamp, and not the future of Apple&#8217; OS packaging.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s ORANGEHAT&#8217;s thoughts. What&#8217;s your personally or professional design opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/08/24/the-snowy-cat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lazy but Pretty.</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/07/16/lazy-but-pretty/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/07/16/lazy-but-pretty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORANGEHAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/07/16/lazy-but-pretty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, so I didn&#8217;t realize the last update was from May. Can&#8217;t believe we missed all of June and half of July. We&#8217;ve had thoughts, but we&#8217;ve been too lazy to put out any updates&#8230;. until now Mwahaha!
Well it&#8217;s not really a blog entry update, so much as a blog skin update. The old look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Wow, so I didn&#8217;t realize the last update was from May. Can&#8217;t believe we missed all of June and half of July. We&#8217;ve had thoughts, but we&#8217;ve been too lazy to put out any updates&#8230;. until now Mwahaha!</p>
<p style="clear: both">Well it&#8217;s not really a blog entry update, so much as a blog skin update. The old look was a good starting point, but being the design firm we are &#8211; wanted to put our on take on the look. So here it is &#8211; our new look. Still have a few things left to sort out, but it&#8217;s presentable. We hope you enjoy the new look.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Stay tuned for some actual content updates. Shock, we know. But we promise they&#8217;re comin&#8217;</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/07/16/lazy-but-pretty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gone Racing</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/05/14/gone-racing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/05/14/gone-racing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORANGEHAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/05/14/gone-racing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to take off the hat and put on the helmet. Ok, we won&#8217;t be racing, but we will be helping in the pits.
ORANGEHAT will be closed today, as we&#8217;re going to be at Summit Point Raceway for a track day.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Time to take off the hat and put on the helmet. Ok, we won&#8217;t be racing, but we will be helping in the pits.</p>
<p style="clear: both">ORANGEHAT will be closed today, as we&#8217;re going to be at Summit Point Raceway for a track day.</p>
<p style="clear: both">
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/05/14/gone-racing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ford&#8217;s Social Fiesta</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/20/fords-socia-fiesta/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/20/fords-socia-fiesta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/20/fords-socia-fiesta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I&#8217;m impressed. The only American car company not taking the Government bail-out money, is forging ahead with a a pretty ingenious (if it works) method of advertising their new car.
The Ford Fiesta, already in Europe, will be coming state side next year, and how are they going to advertise it &#8211; via social networking. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Well I&#8217;m impressed. The only American car company <strong><em>not</em></strong> taking the Government bail-out money, is forging ahead with a a pretty ingenious (if it works) method of advertising their new car.</p>
<p style="clear: both">The Ford Fiesta, already in Europe, will be coming state side next year, and how are they going to advertise it &#8211; via social networking. But everyone&#8217;s done that. Here&#8217;s what makes it so great &#8211; they&#8217;re giving the car to a few dozen people in their 20&#8217;s and they&#8217;re going to give <strong><em>their</em></strong> <strong><em>feedback</em></strong> on social networking accounts that Ford has setup for this campaign. <a href="http://blog.wired.com/cars/2009/04/how-the-fiesta.html" title="Ford's Bet on Social Networking" target="_blank">Wired&#8217;s Autopia goes into the nitty gritty, so be sure to read the article</a>. <u><br /></u></p>
<p style="clear: both">It&#8217;s great that they&#8217;re letting the people do the talking. Takes away the whole idea of them being a &#8220;struggling American car company&#8221; &#8211; which they&#8217;re not &#8211; they&#8217;re the only ones not taking the money. It also shows that they&#8217;re &#8220;in-tune&#8221; (oh, puns are fun) with the younger generations. Plus the fact that they aren&#8217;t going to moderate what these testers are saying about the car is also great. If things go wrong, Ford can show how great they are at finding a solution to a problem. Makes them seem human, and that&#8217;s something an American car company needs desperately right now.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Rock on Ford&#8230;. rock on.</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/20/fords-socia-fiesta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Frame Epedemic</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/15/the-frame-epedemic/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/15/the-frame-epedemic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/15/the-frame-epedemic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a fast and dangerous new practice that ORANGEHAT is seeing on the internets: Website Framing. It&#8217;s been spawned from those URL shorteners for sites like Twitter, and has morphed into a nasty (and tricky) method of sharing links. 
What happens is some websites (even some URL shorteners) take the link you&#8217;re sharing, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">This is a fast and dangerous new practice that ORANGEHAT is seeing on the internets: <strong>Website Framing</strong>. It&#8217;s been spawned from those URL shorteners for sites like Twitter, and has morphed into a nasty (and tricky) method of sharing links. </p>
<p style="clear: both">What happens is <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">some</a> <a href="http://www.digg.com" target="_blank">websites</a> (even some <a href="http://ow.ly/url/shorten-url" target="_blank">URL shorteners</a>) take the link you&#8217;re sharing, and puts the site in their own (sometimes short) URL in place of the actual URL. Digg is the biggest and newest culprit to this deal, and since everyone else is upset with them, let&#8217;s use them as an example. Say something you&#8217;ve posted on your site it&#8217;s a hit, and someone posts it to Digg.com. If someone from Digg wants to view it, Digg provides them a short URL link like: www.digg.com/1234. The site then has a top header (or frame) and loads the site underneath of that, so you can view what you wanted. You&#8217;ve just viewed a framed site.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Here&#8217;s the rub though. And there&#8217;s two biggies. One:<strong> Site traffic is not making it to your site.</strong> People finding your article through digg&#8217;s short URL, aren&#8217;t actually going to your page, but Digg&#8217;s. Because of the frame, Digg gets the hits you should be getting. The second thing plays off the first. If <strong>you don&#8217;t get the hits</strong>, you don&#8217;t get the ad money from google (if you&#8217;re setup) &#8211; <strong>they</strong> do. The other sites are actually the ones making money because their site traffic has increased and then they call sell more ad space. That hurts businesses like us, because we&#8217;re trying to drum up traffic, and they get all the credit. It&#8217;s turning the internet into a big business: the workers bust ass, but the bosses get and take all the credit. And that&#8217;s just not right.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Now this is not to say all URL shorteners are bad &#8211; because they&#8217;re not. Any <a href="http://www.tinyurl.com" target="_blank">Short URL</a> <a href="http://tr.im/" target="_blank">service</a> that serves as a URL redirect (and that&#8217;s the key part) is fine. Granted these kind of services <a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/04/04/why-url-shorteners-s.html" target="_blank">still need some work</a>, and services like Twitter should provide their own solutions, but all-in-all, the idea is decent. </p>
<p style="clear: both">This new epidemic is getting out of hand and hurting the places that are serving up the content for these larger sites to share. <a href="http://daringfireball.net/" target="_blank">Daring Fireball</a> has a lot of methods to help let you block sites from using framework (mostly Diggbar, unsure if they work for all). </p>
<p style="clear: both">Fight the Frames. If you see a frame when you click a link &#8211; click out of it and get redirected, like you should be, and make sure your traffic counts and gets where it should be. Avoid services that use it whenever possible. Make the internet a safe and speedy place to find information, and let everyone get <em>their</em> share of the pie.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Repeat after me: <strong><em>Frames are bad. Frames are bad. </em></strong></p>
<p style="clear: both">All together now!: <strong><em>Frames are bad. Frames are&#8230;.</em></strong></p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/15/the-frame-epedemic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Name Game</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/13/the-name-game/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/13/the-name-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/13/the-name-game/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We tweeted this the other night, but thought it should get a little more light. It&#8217;s a spot promoting a new drink for Gatorade: Tiger Focus. But whose spot was it really? I missed the first few seconds, and when I saw it, I thought for sure it was a Nike commercial. It was only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both"><span style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;"><object height="339" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A_pkN633LgQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A_pkN633LgQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" height="339" width="560"></embed></object></span><br style="clear: both" /><br />We <a href="http://www.twitter.com/orangehatdesign" target="_blank">tweeted</a> this the other night, but thought it should get a little more light. It&#8217;s a spot promoting a new drink for Gatorade: Tiger Focus. But whose spot was it really? I missed the first few seconds, and when I saw it, I thought for sure it was a Nike commercial. It was only until I saw the Gatorade bolt on the sign (while Young Tiger was on his way to the &#8220;waterfall&#8221;) that I finally figured it out it was for Gatorade. I then wondered, does Nike own Tiger so much, that even when he&#8217;s <em>animated</em>, there still needs to be a Nike logo somewhere on his outfit. It&#8217;s the first time I can think of that a secondary logo wasn&#8217;t blurred out, taped over, or what-have-you. Plus it had equal (if not more) prominence in the spot over what was actually being sold. </p>
<p style="clear: both">&#8220;Papa&#8221; Nike must be watching his &#8220;son&#8221; closely &#8211; <strong><em>&#8220;Don&#8217;t be late for practice, home by 10, and no talking to strange wildlife creatures!&#8221;</em></strong> With that much prominence in a spot, it makes us wonder if Tiger&#8217;s name hasn&#8217;t been changed to Tiger Nike Woods. </p>
<p style="clear: both">
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/04/13/the-name-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy New Year!!</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORANGEHAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ORANGEHAT would like to wish all of you a happy and safe 2009! 
We expect lots of great things for the next 365 days &#8211; and hopefully beyond!
Cheers!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both"><strong>ORANGEHAT would like to wish all of you a happy and safe 2009! </strong></p>
<p style="clear: both">We expect lots of great things for the next 365 days &#8211; and hopefully beyond!</p>
<p style="clear: both">Cheers!</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/01/happy-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
