<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ORANGEBLOG &#187; Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/category/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com</link>
	<description>A peek under our brim, to see what we're thinking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Snowy Cat</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/08/24/the-snowy-cat/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/08/24/the-snowy-cat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I make no attempts to hide our love of Apple Computers here at ORANGEHAT. And today I was welcomed to the pre-order of the latest version of Mac OS X &#8211; Snow Leopard (10.6). Of course I&#8217;ve placed our order and will be upgrading this weekend, but that&#8217;s not why I&#8217;m typing this. Although, if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make no attempts to hide our love of Apple Computers here at ORANGEHAT. And today I was welcomed to the pre-order of the latest version of Mac OS X &#8211; Snow Leopard (10.6). Of course I&#8217;ve placed our order and will be upgrading this weekend, but that&#8217;s not why I&#8217;m typing this. Although, if you want to pick up a copy, head on over to <a title="Preorder Snow Leopard" href="http://store.apple.com/" target="_blank">Apple&#8217;s Online Store.</a> <img src='http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Moreover, it&#8217;s about the new packaging of the OS. This will mark the first time that Apple has actually used a picture of the corresponding animal for box art. Place your peepers on this:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Snow Leopard" src="http://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/2041/1580/as-images.apple.com/is/image/AppleInc/MC223?wid=326&amp;hei=326&amp;fmt=jpeg&amp;qlt=95&amp;op_sharpen=0&amp;resMode=bicub&amp;op_usm=0.5,0.5,0,0&amp;iccEmbed=0&amp;layer=comp" alt="" width="326" height="326" /></p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not really feeling it. In the past, it was the focus on the &#8220;X&#8221; for the version of OS X (10). In version 10.2 (aka Jaguar), Apple had Pixar created a spotted version of the &#8220;X&#8221;. Complete with fur textures and patterns of the big kitty. And while granted, this is not a full revamped OS, like previous .1+ upgrades, I do find it strange for them to be focusing on imagery like this. Even box art that uses images (iPods, iPhones, iMacs, etc), they seem to use the images in a more elegant way. I really enjoy the simple and more dynamic layouts that Apple has produced, and I hope this is simply a one-off since this OS is just a retooling and not a revamp, and not the future of Apple&#8217; OS packaging.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s ORANGEHAT&#8217;s thoughts. What&#8217;s your personally or professional design opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/08/24/the-snowy-cat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Un-Hidden Harbour</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/23/un-hidden-harbour/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/23/un-hidden-harbour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/23/un-hidden-harbour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, we have a portfolio page to show off all of our work, but we think larger projects should get a mention here in the blog too. Plus there&#8217;s no rules that say we can&#8217;t do that (it is our site, so we can make the rules). About two weeks ago, we wrapped up our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Yes, we have a <a href="http://www.orangehatdesign.com/ourwork.php" title="{Our Work}" target="_blank">portfolio page</a> to show off all of our work, but we think larger projects should get a mention here in the blog too. Plus there&#8217;s no rules that say we can&#8217;t do that (it is <em>our</em> site, so we can make the rules). About two weeks ago, we wrapped up our latest website design &#038; development project for a Condo Association in Ocean City, MD. </p>
<p style="clear: both">For <a href="http://www.islandathiddenharbour.com/" title="The Island at Hidden Harbour" target="_blank">The Island at Hidden Harbour</a>, ORANGEHAT coordinated transferring the domain, setting up the new sever, along with our a complete site redesign and development. The new site now sports a custom blog system, photo gallery and classifieds. But the main highlight of the site, is something you&#8217;ll never see &#8211; a custom Admin section. The Association wanted to be able to update their content on their own, and ORANGEHAT was happy to oblige. 95% of the content is available for them to update and customize. We created the look and design, along with all code &#8211; from scratch, because, well, that&#8217;s what we do.</p>
<p style="clear: both">They also got an early release of <strong>File&#8217;s Up!</strong> Which we plan on having more info on that project in the near future. More on that later.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Very happy with our latest project, and we look forward to the next!</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/23/un-hidden-harbour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release the Child!</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/02/release-the-child/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/02/release-the-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/02/release-the-child/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I almost forgot about this! While at a local car show, I couldn&#8217;t help but chuckle at the graphic on a new Dodge Ram. On the bed, they offer these storage boxes (called RamBox), and for safety reasons, have to use a quick release &#8211; in case any small children decide to hide in there. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">I almost forgot about this! While at a local car show, I couldn&#8217;t help but chuckle at the graphic on a new Dodge Ram. On the bed, they offer these storage boxes (called RamBox), and for safety reasons, have to use a quick release &#8211; in case any small children decide to hide in there. </p>
<p style="clear: both">I couldn&#8217;t help my but laugh at the way Dodge made the graphic to show the use of this handle. I think the designers had a tad bit of fun with this. Well, let&#8217;s just let the picture speak for itself. </p>
<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/img-0328.jpg" class="image-link"><img class="linked-to-original" src="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/img-1.jpg" height="460" align="left" width="359" style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" /></a></p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/03/02/release-the-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Didn&#8217;t take long&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/02/23/didnt-take-long/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/02/23/didnt-take-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/02/23/didnt-take-long/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had commented earlier about Tropicana changing their brand and packaging. We didn&#8217;t think highly of it, and apparently neither did most of the generic public either. Back to the classic &#8211; and that&#8217;s great thing.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">We had <a href="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/06/good-tasting-but-bad-looking-oj/" title="Tropicana Rebrand" target="_blank">commented earlier</a> about Tropicana changing their brand and packaging. We didn&#8217;t think highly of it, and apparently neither did most of the generic public either. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/23/business/media/23adcol.html?_r=2&#038;pagewanted=all" title="Tropicana Dumps new look" target="_blank">Back to the classic</a> &#8211; and that&#8217;s great thing.</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/02/23/didnt-take-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good tasting, but bad looking, OJ.</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/06/good-tasting-but-bad-looking-oj/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/06/good-tasting-but-bad-looking-oj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/06/good-tasting-but-bad-looking-oj/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m usually all for new designs &#8211; it brings a fresh look and attitude to the product/project. But, as with any good design, it also needs to do it&#8217;s job, and do it better than before. Our favorite orange juice &#8211; Tropicana, has fallen a bit far from the tree.
I had seen tentative designs for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">I&#8217;m usually all for new designs &#8211; it brings a fresh look and attitude to the product/project. But, as with any good design, it also needs to do it&#8217;s job, and do it better than before. Our favorite orange juice &#8211; Tropicana, has fallen a bit far from the tree.</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/old-new-1.jpg" height="354" align="left" width="321" style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" /><br style="clear: both" />I had seen tentative designs for the new <a href="http://www.underconsideration.com/mt_uc/mt-search.cgi?search=Tropicana&#038;Template=search_brandnew&#038;IncludeBlogs=4" title="Tropicana" target="_blank">Tropicana package</a> design (which the link actually looks better than the end result), and while we were out grocery shopping last weekend, I saw my first batch of them in person. Seen above, you can see the new design compared to the old. There is little merit in the more simplistic layout and look. It does distinguish it slightly from the other packaging around, but it doesn&#8217;t do it in the &#8220;we&#8217;re the best OJ&#8221;, but more in the &#8220;We look inexpensive&#8221;. The new logo is pretty nice &#8211; it&#8217;s simple and to the point &#8211; a cleaned up variation of the old that gets to the core of the logo&#8217;s soul. But that&#8217;s all the good I could squeeze out&#8230; I couldn&#8217;t resist the pun. </p>
<p style="clear: both">The focal point of the design is the new cropped glass of orange juice &#8211; which you can barely make out. The balance between that, and the rotation of the name of the juice is just&#8230;. off. I read &#8220;100% orange&#8221; before I read the brand of juice, which is a no-no. I&#8217;m going to assume that in time people will just recognize the package to be Tropicana, but I feel that&#8217;s a bit too far of an assumption. On top of that, the negative space below the logo does little in directing me to the remaining copy at the bottom and is really just a waste. Lastly, and this is the big one, the type of orange juice has become almost an afterthought. Above you saw the old <strong>&#8220;Light &#8216;N Healthy&#8221;</strong> bottle, below you see the <strong>&#8220;Some Pulp&#8221;</strong> in comparison to the new bottle. Take a peek, and I&#8217;ll meet you under the image. </p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/old-new1.jpg" height="351" align="left" width="335" style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" /><br style="clear: both" />Ok, now that you&#8217;ve seen both images &#8211; what do you see in the previous layouts? A very large color bar with easily readable text to help at a very quick glance distinguish which juice variant is which. Now, take a look below and see the difference between the new <strong>&#8220;Pulp Free&#8221;</strong> and <strong>&#8220;High Pulp&#8221;</strong> bottles&#8230; I&#8217;m warning you now, it may take a second&#8230;</p>
<p style="clear: both"><img src="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/comparison3.jpg" height="267" align="left" width="337" style=" display: inline; float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" /><br style="clear: both" />The type is <strong>buried</strong> in the glass of juice and the only difference is the color of the text. It&#8217;s a much smaller font size and almost impossible to notice at a glance. I fear that there will be many little kids (heck even a big kid like me) upset because mom (or dad) made a quick glance and grabbed the wrong pulp&#8217;d OJ. What a way to start your morning, with a swig full of the wrong OJ! And as with my grocery store, the bottles easily mixed up, so you could have a &#8220;Pulp Free&#8221; in a &#8220;High-Pulp&#8221; area, and now it&#8217;s going to be much harder to tell. The old worked so well &#8211; you saw a big orange with a straw, and your appropriately colored bar and cap, and you were on your way &#8211; no reading needed &#8211; the design spoke and worked so well. It&#8217;s truly a shame that Pepsi has gone and done this to my beloved OJ.</p>
<p style="clear: both">But I shouldn&#8217;t be too surprised. This comes right off the heels of Pepsi doing a basically rebrand of every beverage they own. From the new Pepsi <a href="http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/the_new_pepsi_challenge_guess.php" title="Arggh!!" target="_blank">&#8220;pirate eye&#8221;</a> logo, to the new Gatorade <a href="http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/pepsi_revealed_sort_of.php" target="_blank">&#8220;G&#8221;</a> bottles, they&#8217;re trying to be more hip and distinguish themselves from Coke I guess. Will we stop buying Tropicana, not likely. We are brand loyal like that, and we do feel it&#8217;s the best OJ out there. But a new layout without substance and meaning is just something that, like the drinks inside them, will go bad quickly. </p>
<p style="clear: both">
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2009/01/06/good-tasting-but-bad-looking-oj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official Footwear</title>
		<link>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2008/12/06/official-footwear/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2008/12/06/official-footwear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The HAT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORANGEHAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2008/12/06/official-footwear/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re big fans of brand integrity here at ORANGEHAT. We love it when we can expand our brand and our look in so many aspects of our company. And a big tip of our HAT goes to Converse for offering yet another way to customize their shoes. A fan favorite ours here is the Double [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re big fans of brand integrity here at ORANGEHAT. We love it when we can expand our brand and our look in so many aspects of our company. And a big tip of our HAT goes to Converse for offering yet another way to customize their shoes. A fan favorite ours here is the Double Tongue Chuck Tayler® and they just became available on their website to customize. And behold, the official shoe for ORANGEHAT has been created. We should get our pair in 2-4 weeks, and are pretty excited. If you&#8217;d like to order your own ORANGEHAT Chuck, email us, and we can send you the steps to build your own!</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/n1208291993-30221092-7719.jpg" alt="n1208291993-30221092-7719.jpg" width="371" height="272" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.orangehatdesign.com/2008/12/06/official-footwear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
